Hybrid Secure Code Review

A code review approach that blends automated scanning with manual expert analysis to uncover logic flaws, race conditions, and access control issues missed by tools.

Let’s Join Us

Class IT 2024

0

Class Basic 

0
Learn Beyond Boundaries

Methodology

$ 654

Code & Context Understanding

Identify critical modules, trust boundaries, high-risk functions, and UI entry points to define the application attack surface before review begins.

$ 654

Hybrid Analysis

Run SAST, dependency, and IaC scans for baseline issues, then perform targeted expert review of complex logic and custom components.

$ 654

Full-Context Exploitability Review

Follow vulnerabilities from backend to frontend, manually analyzing logic flows, race conditions, timing issues, and chained business impact.

$ 654

Actionable Reporting

Provide line-level annotated findings with file references, UI impact context, and stack-specific remediation guidance.

What We Assess

  • End-to-end data flows connecting frontend UI inputs to backend execution and database interactions.
  • Business logic abuse, authorization bypasses, and race condition opportunities across complex application workflows.
  • Authentication mechanisms, access-control boundaries, and session management code paths.

What You Receive

Annotated Reporting

Executive and technical reports with line-level code annotations and real-world business impact context

UI Exploit Narratives

Explain how backend flaws translate into UI-level exploitable vulnerabilities.

SBOM Risk Analysis

Dependency and SBOM analysis with direct CVE references and third-party risk mapping.

Secure Code Fixes

Line-level fix recommendations using secure coding patterns matched to your tech stack.

Hybrid Vulnerability Review

Automated tools handle baseline coverage, while engineers focus on complex, context-dependent vulnerabilities requiring human judgment.

Standards-Based Review

Findings are mapped to modules and UI features for clear ownership across development teams.

Standards-Based Review

Assessed against OWASP Code Review Guide, CWE Top 25, and NIST SSDF standards.

Engagement Snapshot

  • Automated tooling handles baseline coverage, freeing expert engineers to focus on complex, context-dependent vulnerabilities that require human reasoning.
  • Findings are mapped to specific modules and UI features, making fix ownership straightforward to assign across development teams.
  • Assessed against the OWASP Code Review Guide, CWE Top 25, and NIST SSDF for thorough industry-standard coverage.